thank you finally someone has the balls to publicly show her flaws!

Readers meet Nicole Maron...a 35 year old, self-described "very liberal," atheist from San Francisco whose profile tells us she is a Gemini with "some college" whose personality is INFP (Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving). In linking to this post on StumbleUpon Nicole states: "My comment, which of course will not be published by the site owner...." She hasn't even gotten to her comment and she's already objectively wrong. That might be a new record.

Both Bush and McCain certainly have their faults, not being particularly conservative high on the list for both. However, even their most ardent critics on the left would put advocating both sides of an issue far down the list. As to Hillary, however, as I pointed out in the post, even liberals and those who would likely vote for her openly mock the fact that she has frequently taken both sides of issues. I wasn't just posting my opinion on the subject but, rather, the opinions of liberal pundits.

The one example you point out with regard to McCain voting against various veterans bills evidences your naiveté. While I may not agree with every vote McCain has made, I can certainly understand that not every bill with the word "veteran" in it is a good bill. In trying to understand McCain's positions with which I disagree, I have actually pulled some of the actual bills off of Westlaw that McCain is criticized for vetoing and waded through good portions of their hundreds of pages. The unfortunate reality in congress is that the entire system is so corrupt that nothing gets passed that isn't objectionable for a hundred different reasons. I've often argued that I'd love to see a president veto every bill that congress passed if it had the slightest bit of pork. Pass a bill guarantying free air for everyone with just one cent of pork...Veto!

Our national debt is over $9 trillion. You owe nearly $31,000 of it. My family owes $124,000! And that doesn't even include the unfunded mandates of all the entitlement programs which total $53 trillion...that's $175,000 for every man, woman and child, $455,000 per household, or $410,000 per worker!!! And, these ridiculous expenditures are increasing! We don't have any money for veterans, for children, for corporations, for individuals, for the elderly, for wars, for peace, for anything! So, if someone wants to vote against something I'm all for it...I'll take my precious time to analyze what they are voting for.

As poorly constructed as the bills are that make it out of congress, it will most always be a balancing act as to whether the good in a bill out weighs the bad. You cannot be intellectually honest and proclaim that the various bills you reference were without flaws...accordingly whether McCain should have voted for them is a subjective matter...which brings us back to Hillary and her public statements which don't have anything to do with voting for or against flawed bills. Hillary has objectively stood on both sides of more issues than any candidate in history.

I'll let the reader decide whether the opinions I express in my blog "lack historical knowledge" or are otherwise "baseless" or "knee-jerk." I've proven time and again that such criticisms are meritless.

As for my "juvenile attacks on her looks"...it's just a montage of photos taken by her friend the mainstream press. Hardly an "attack." If you have a problem with Ms. Clinton looking less-than-presidential, take it up with her.

[Note: I will give Nicole credit. She's not a drive by anonymous troll that has been popular of late. She posted under her own name and while she did not leave a website, she was easily traceable through StumbleUpon which links to her personal blog.]

Hillary admits she mispoke about her Bosnia visit but there's is much more to tell about her part in wars. See http://www.bizarrepolitics.com/clinton-wars-hillary-was-there and see time line of her part in Free Trade history. NAFTA was not the beginning. See http://www.bizarreplolitics.com/hillary-nafta-dillydally/